January 15, 2025

Jerry Arbittier

Artificial Intelligence (AI) has been the ‘most discussed’ topic over the last two years, and the commercialization as well as widespread use of AI has changed the landscape of the professional world forever. One area where AI has made a significant impact is healthcare market research, especially in data collection and processing. Traditionally, researchers have relied on methods like surveys, focus groups, and interviews, which often require large teams and substantial time investments. However, AI has automated and streamlined these processes, increasing efficiency. One of the more intriguing, controversial and widely discussed ways AI is transforming healthcare research is through the use of ‘synthetic data.’

What exactly is synthetic data, and why is it generating so much buzz?

Synthetic data is artificially created data that replicates real-world patterns and structures, but is generated through algorithms or simulations rather than actual events or human subjects. Techniques such as machine learning, statistical models, or simulations are used to generate data points that statistically resemble the original data they aim to replicate. While synthetic data mimics the characteristics of real data, it does so without relying on personal or sensitive information, making it a valuable tool for safe and scalable sampling.

Leveraging Synthetic Data for Sampling is a tricky topic to explore, but we want to approach this by reviewing both the pros and cons of using synthetic data for Research Sampling with an emphasis on Healthcare research.

Pros of Using Synthetic Data for Healthcare Research Sampling

1. Data Privacy and Security
  • Advantage: Synthetic data does not use real patient/HCP data, which means it does not contain sensitive or personally identifiable information. This ensures compliance with data privacy regulations like HIPAA (Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act) in the U.S. and GDPR (General Data Protection Regulation) in Europe.
  • Impact: Researchers can work with synthetic datasets without the risk of data breaches or unauthorized access to personal health information, making it a safe option for sampling in sensitive healthcare research
2. Overcoming Data Scarcity
  • Advantage: In many healthcare research scenarios, real-world data can be scarce and respondents hard to find, especially for rare diseases.niche medical conditions or small specialty populations. Synthetic data can be generated in abundance, overcoming the limitations of small sample sizes.
  • Impact: Researchers can generate large, diverse, and representative datasets that might not be readily available in real-world data, enabling studies on underrepresented patient populations or specific disease groups.
3. Cost-Effectiveness
  • Advantage: Collecting real-world healthcare data can be expensive, requiring time, effort, and resources. By using synthetic data, researchers can reduce the costs associated with data collection, cleaning, and processing
  • Impact: Synthetic data provides an affordable alternative to costly clinical trials or surveys, while still offering statistically valid results for analysis and testing.
4Speed and Flexibility
  • Advantage: Synthetic data can be generated quickly and tailored to the specific needs of a study. If a researcher needs a dataset with certain characteristics (e.g., a specific age range, disease type, or demographic), synthetic data can be customized to meet those requirements.
  • Impact: This allows researchers to quickly prototype and test hypotheses without waiting for real-world data to be collected, speeding up the research and development process

Cons of Using Synthetic Data for Healthcare Research Sampling

1. Lack of Real-World Variability
  • Disadvantage: While synthetic data mimics the statistical properties of real-world data, it cannot fully replicate the complexity and variability found in actual healthcare environments. Factors like unreported conditions, unforeseen patient behaviors, and environmental influences may be missing or inadequately captured.
  • Impact: The generated data may not fully reflect real-world scenarios, leading to findings that may not be as applicable or reliable when applied to real healthcare settings.
2. Risk of Inaccurate Model Assumptions
  • Disadvantage: The algorithms used to generate synthetic data rely on assumptions about the real-world data. If these assumptions are incorrect, the synthetic data generated could be biased or inaccurate.
  • Impact: Misleading synthetic datasets can lead to flawed conclusions, especially in healthcare research where patient outcomes and treatment responses may vary based on factors not fully captured by the generative model.
3. Limited Generalizability
  • Disadvantage: Synthetic data might not always reflect the true diversity of the real population. While the data may be statistically representative of certain characteristics, it may lack the richness and depth of actual patient data, particularly in rare conditions or new diseases.
  • Impact: Healthcare researchers may find that conclusions drawn from synthetic data are not always applicable to specific patient subgroups or populations in the real world.
4. Ethical and Regulatory Concerns
  • Disadvantage: Despite not containing personally identifiable information, the use of synthetic data can still raise ethical questions. Regulatory bodies may be cautious about accepting synthetic data for certain types of research, particularly clinical trials or decision-making processes.
  • Impact: Synthetic data is often used for preliminary research or model testing, but its use in regulatory approval processes or high-stakes clinical decisions may still face significant barriers.
5. Lack of Longitudinal Data
  • Disadvantage: Healthcare research often benefits from longitudinal data, where patient health is tracked over time. Generating synthetic data that captures these long-term trends can be difficult, as it requires modeling complex timelines of healthcare interactions, treatments, and outcomes.
  • Impact: Without the ability to accurately replicate long-term patient data, synthetic datasets may fall short in areas like understanding disease progression, treatment adherence, and long-term outcomes.

Synthetic data offers a solution for expanding sample sizes and enhancing research efficiency, particularly in fields like healthcare. Its ability to replicate real-world data patterns without compromising privacy or requiring sensitive personal information is a significant advantage. However, it also comes with its challenges, including potential issues with data accuracy, representativeness, and the risk of introducing biases. 

With opinions on AI’s impact still divided, I’d love to hear your perspective as industry leaders: Do you view AI as a catalyst for innovation, or a cause for concern?

• • • • •

Want more market research best practices information?

 Contact us at jerry.arbittier@aops.us or 917-327-0533.
Copyright © 2025 AOPS — Velux WordPress theme by GoDaddy